TED演讲之性别无限:出身决定命运?(4)
And that was democracy growing up,
民主制度在当时正在形成
but it was also science growing up at the same time.
但同时科技也在发展
And it's really clear, if you look at the history of the Founding Fathers,
非常明显的是，如果你注意一下建国者的历史
a lot of them were very interested in science,
他们中的许多人都对科学很感兴趣
and they were interested in a concept
并且他们都对自然主义世界这个概念
of a naturalistic world.
很感兴趣
They were moving away from supernatural explanations,
他们摒弃超自然的说法
and they were rejecting things like a supernatural concept of power,
他们排斥那些关于超自然力量的说法
where it transmitted
因为超自然力量的概念被传播
because of a very vague concept of birthright.
是基于非常模糊的身世的理念
They were moving towards a naturalistic concept.
他们倡导自然主义的概念
And if you look, for example, in the Declaration of Independence,
如果你观察会发现，例如在独立宣言中
they talk about nature and nature's God.
他们提及到自然和自然之神
They don't talk about God and God's nature.
他们没有提到上帝和上帝的自然
They're talking about the power of nature
他们提到自然的力量
to tell us who we are.
来解释我们是谁
So as part of that,
因此作为其中的一部分
they were coming to us with a concept
他们为我们带来一个概念
that was about anatomical commonality.
那就是人人生来平等
And in doing so, they were really setting up in a beautiful way
为此，他们确实为将来的民权运动
the Civil Rights movement of the future.
铺垫了一个很美好的道路
They didn't think of it that way, but they did it for us, and it was great.
他们想不到将来会怎样，但是他们为我们奠定了基础，这是非常伟大的
So what happened years afterward?
那么数年后发生了什么呢？
What happened was women, for example,
例如在女性身上都发生了什么
who wanted the right to vote,
她们渴望投票的权利
took the Founding Fathers' concept
按照建国者的概念
of anatomical commonality being more important
人人平等要远重要于
than anatomical difference
人的出身
and said, "The fact that we have a uterus and ovaries
她们说：“我们有子宫和卵巢是事实
is not significant enough in terms of a difference
这些不同完全不足以
to mean that we shouldn't have the right to vote,
意味着我们没有投票权
the right to full citizenship,
没有充分的公民权利
the right to own property, etc., etc."
没有私人财产权等等”
And women successfully argued that.
女性的主张获得了成效
Next came the successful Civil Rights movement,
接下来便是成功的民权运动
where we found people like Sojourner Truth
运动中出现了像索杰纳·特鲁思这样的人
talking about, "Ain't I a woman?"
她的名言“我就不是女人吗？”
We find men
我们知道男人
on the marching lines of the Civil Rights movement
曾经在民权运动的发展路线上
saying, "I am a man."
有句名言“我是个男人”
Again, people of color
此外，有色人群
appealing to a commonality of anatomy over a difference of anatomy,
呼吁人人平等而不应种族歧视
again, successfully.
再者，
We see the same thing with the disability rights movement.
我们看到同样的成功案例发生在伤残人士的权利运动中
The problem is, of course,
问题是，当然
that, as we begin to look at all that commonality,
当我们开始去审视所有的公民
we have to begin to question
我们不得不开始质疑
why we maintain certain divisions.
为什么我们去维护一个固定的界限
Now mind you, I want to maintain some divisions,
现在，需要提醒大家的是，我希望去保持一些界限
anatomically, in our culture.
身体结构上的，在我们的文化范围被内
For example, I don't want
举个例子，我不希望
to give a fish the same rights as a human.
给予鱼和人类一样的权利
I don't want to say we give up entirely on anatomy.
我不希望我们放弃一切在解剖学上的区分界限
I don't want to say five-year-olds
我不希望，一个五岁的孩子
should be allowed to consent to sex or consent to marry.
可以被允许有性行为或者说允许结婚
So there are some anatomical divisions
所以说，有一些在解剖学上的界限
that make sense to me and that I think we should retain.
对我们来说是有意义的，我想那些应该被保留
But the challenge is trying to figure out which ones they are
但是，艰巨的任务是试着去找出哪些是应该保留的
and why do we retain them and do they have meaning.
为什么我们要保留它们，它们有什么意义
So let's go back to those two beings
所以，让我们回到刚才说到的那两人
conceived at the beginning of this talk.
就是演讲一开始所虚构的那两个人
We have two beings, both conceived
我们有两对夫妇
in the middle of 1979 on the exact same day.
都在1979年年中的同一天怀孕了
Let's imagine one of them, Mary,
让我们设想一下，玛丽
is born three months prematurely,
提前三个月出生了
so she's born on June 1, 1980.
因此她出生于1980年6月1日
Henry, by contrast, is born at term,
亨利，相反的，足月出生
so he's born on March 1, 1980.
他出生于1980年3月1日
Simply by virtue of the fact
仅仅是由于
that Mary was born prematurely three months,
玛丽早出生了三个月这个事实
she comes into all sorts of rights
她获得各种权利的时间
three months earlier than Henry does —
要比亨利早三个月
the right to consent to sex,
允许有性行为的权利
the right to vote, the right to drink.
选举的权利，喝酒的权利
Henry has to wait for all of that,
亨利就不得不等待
not because he's actually any different in age, biologically,
他的生理学年龄没有任何不同
except in terms of when he was born.
只是因为他出生的时间不同
We find other kinds of weirdness in terms of what their rights are.
我们还发现其他一些离奇的权利问题
Henry, by virtue of being assumed to be male —
亨利，由于被假定为男性–
although I haven't told you that he's the XY one —
尽管我没有告诉过大家他是XY型染色体——
by virtue of being assumed to be male
由于被假定为男性
is now liable to be drafted,
所以现在要应征入伍
which Mary does not need to worry about.
玛丽就不需要去担心这些
Mary, meanwhile, cannot in all the states
与此同时，玛丽不能在所有的州
have the same right that Henry has in all the states,
像亨利一样享受同样权利
namely, the right to marry.
也就是，结婚的权利
Henry can marry in every state a woman,
亨利可以在任何一个州结婚
but Mary can only marry today in a few states a woman.
但是玛丽如今只能在少数几个州娶一位女性
So we have these anatomical categories that persist
因此我们所坚持的一些结构上的生物分类
that are in many ways problematic and questionable.
它们在很多方面是有问题并且需要质疑的
演讲简介：
艾丽丝·德雷格尔和她的同伴一起从事于边缘解剖学，例如连体儿和双性人。根据她的观察，在其他的结构特征中，男性和女性的分界线是很模糊的。为我们带来了一个问题：为什么要让我们的生理特征决定我们的命运。
NSDA“SDcamps”全国英语演讲与辩论大赛（大学组）/SDcamps全国中小学生英语演讲与辩论大会（中小学及幼儿组）/美式辩论赛（以下简称大赛/大会）现诚招全国省市合作伙伴或城市合伙人，共同进行推广NSDA赛事品牌、举办赛事及培训活动、开展素质教育、美式营地项目等多方面合作。
我们希望认同NSDA理念，有赛事组织经验，或有教育资源，特别是有理想有热情的机构或个人一起携手，共同推广NSDA品牌、赛事及素质教育。以机构的形式，或以城市合伙人的方式均可。具体的赛事组织、盈利模式，欢迎电话或微信咨询。
微信：0012133598196
