奥巴马每周电视讲话:总统呼吁填补最高法院空缺
WeeklyAddress: It's Time to Fill the Vacancy on the Supreme Court
奥巴马每周电视演讲：是填补最高法院空缺的时候了
Hi, folks. Joe Biden here and I'm sitting with Tim Lewis, a retired federal judge who was nominated to the bench by a Republican President
嗨，大家好。与本人乔·拜登坐在一起的是蒂姆·刘易斯一名退休的联邦法官，他曾是共和党总统提名，
and confirmed by a Democratic Senate – within four weeks of a presidential election.
并在总统选举的四周内由民主党主政的参议院批准的。
Hello, everyone. That's right. And I'm living proof that President Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court
各位，你好。是的，我的经历证明奥巴马总统提名的最高法院
Chief Judge Merrick Garland-deserves similar consideration by today's Senate.
首席法官麦瑞克·加兰德，值得今天的参议院考虑。
Not only because Merrick Garland is recognized I might know – without exception – by the right and the left as one of America's sharpest legal minds and a model of integrity.
不仅因为我想我知道麦瑞克·加兰德得到左右两派一致肯定，是美国最有鲜明法律思想的正直典范。
But also because that's what the Constitution requires.
还因为这是宪法所要求的。
The sitting President shall-not may-but shall nominate someone to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court, with the advice and consent of the Senate.
现任总统应该，而不是可能，提名人选填补最高法院的空缺，与参议院磋商并获得通过。
That includes consulting and voting.
包括听证和投票。
Here's how it works. For 17 years, I was chairman or the ranking member of the top opposition party person and Senate Judiciary Committee, which overseas nominations to the Court, all court, all federal courts.
这是它的工作程序。17 年来，我是反对派成员，也是参议院司法委员会主席及核心成员，审核海外所有法院、所有联邦法院提名法官。
I presided over nine supreme court nominees-more than anyone alive. Some I supported. Others I didn't.
我经手了九个以上的提名，比任何人都多。有些我支持。另一些我反对。
But every nominee was greeted by committee members.
但每一个被提名的候选人都受到委员会成员的重视。
Every nominee got a committee hearing.
每个被提名者都会安排一次听证会。
Every nominee got out of the committee to the Senate floor, even when a nominee did'nt receive under the law's majority support in my committee to be reported out.
每一位被提名人都会提交参议院，即使被提名人没有得到法律规定的委员会多数成员支持。
As I thought the senate should advise the scene not the committee,
而且我认为参议院应该对这一事实提出建议，而不是委员会
And every nominee, including Justice Kennedy – in an election year-got an up or down vote by the Senate.
每位被提名者，包括肯尼迪大法官，在大选之年得以提交参议院直接投票表决。
Not much of the time. Not most of the time. Every single time.
不是多数情况，也不是大多数情况，而是每一次都如此。
That's the Constitution's clear rule of Advice and Consent.
这是宪法明确支持的规则。
And that's the rule being violated today by Senate Republicans.
而今天的参议院共和党人践踏这一规则。
Nobody is suggesting that Senators have to vote "yes" on a nominee.
没有人提议参议员对提名的人选只能投"赞成"票。
Voting "no" is always an option for any senetor.
投票"反对"一直是个选项。
But saying nothing, seeing nothing, reading nothing, hearing nothing, and deciding in advance, to simply to turn your back-is not an option the Constitution leaves open to United States.
但不说、不看、不读、不听，前期决定只是背向翻开的宪法不予提交表决。
And it has real consequences for all of us.
这对我们所有人都造成严重的后果。
In the four months since Merrick Garland's nomination, we've already seen
麦瑞克·加兰德法官的提名过去 4 个月了， 我们已看到
how the Senate's refusal to act is preventing the Court from fulfilling its duty of interpreting what the law is and resolving conflicts in lower courts.
参议院拒绝采取行动正在妨碍法院履行其职责：解释法律、解决下级法院的矛盾。
This historic obstruction is leading to greater litigation costs and delays
历史性的问题是产生更大的诉讼成本和诉讼拖延，
the burden falling mostly on average Americans rather than corporations with endless resources.
美国人的平均负担难以降低而让政府无止境地消耗资源。
Unresolved decisions by the Supreme Court are leading to federal laws that should apply to the whole country being constitutional in some parts but unconstitutional in others.
最高法院未做的裁决正在导致应适用全国的联邦法律，有些符合宪法还有些却违宪。
If this continues, our freedom of speech, our freedom to practice our faith, our right to vote, our right to privacy-all could depend on where we happen to live.
如果这种情况继续下去，言论自由、信仰、选举权、隐私权等都可能取决于我们生活所在地。
And the longer the vacancy remains unfilled, the more serious the problem-with greater confusion and uncertainty about our safety and security.
首席法官长期空缺的更严重的问题是个人和国土安全更加无序而难以确保。
You know, if you have eight Justices on a court, Justice Scalia himself wrote, that it raises the, "possibility that, by reason of a tie vote,
如果在一个法院有八位法官， 法官斯卡利亚本人写道，会突出这种"可能由于票数的原因，
the Court will find itself unable to resolve the significant legal issues presented by the case."
法院将发现自己无法解决案例提出的重大法律问题。"
And if Republican Senators fail to act, it could be an entire year before a fully staffed Supreme Court can resolve any significant issue before it.
如果共和党参议员未能采取行动，可能一整年都如此，在满员的最高法院能够解决任何重大问题之前。
Folks, there's enough dysfunction in Washington, D.C. Now is not the time for it to spread that dysfunction from the Congress to the Supreme Court.
诸位，华盛顿特区的功能障碍够多的了，现在不能从国会蔓延到最高法院。
And we're better than what we're seeing.
情况好于比我们所看到的。
As a country, we're only as strong as the traditions we value- that we sustain by dedicating ourselves to something bigger than ourselves.
作为一个国家，我们仅传统价值观强大，我们要尽最大努力保持其生命力。
Folks, the defining difference of our great democracy has always been
各位，我们伟大的民主的定义差异可以一直探讨，
that we can reason our way through to what ails us and then act as citizens, voters, and public servants to fix it.
以什么方式摆脱困扰，而作为公民、选民和公务员去修复它。
But we have to act in good faith. For unless we can find common ground, we cannot govern.
但我们必须真诚地行动。因为只有找到共同点，我们才能治理。
So for the sake of the country we love-we all have to do our job.
为了我们热爱的这个国家， 我们都必须尽职尽责。
The President has done his. The Senate Republicans must do theirs.
总统已经做了他份内的事。参议院共和党人也必须做。
Thanks for listening and hope you have a great weekend.
谢谢大家，祝周末愉快。
NSDA“SDcamps”全国英语演讲与辩论大赛（大学组）/SDcamps全国中小学生英语演讲与辩论大会（中小学及幼儿组）/美式辩论赛（以下简称大赛/大会）现诚招全国省市合作伙伴或城市合伙人，共同进行推广NSDA赛事品牌、举办赛事及培训活动、开展素质教育、美式营地项目等多方面合作。
我们希望认同NSDA理念，有赛事组织经验，或有教育资源，特别是有理想有热情的机构或个人一起携手，共同推广NSDA品牌、赛事及素质教育。以机构的形式，或以城市合伙人的方式均可。具体的赛事组织、盈利模式，欢迎电话或微信咨询。